↓ Skip to main content

Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-12-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Witzel, Vitaly Napadow, Norman W Kettner, Mark G Vangel, Matti S Hämäläinen, Rupali P Dhond

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 17 19%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Psychology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2011.
All research outputs
#3,470,487
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#140
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,199
of 122,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.