↓ Skip to main content

Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose? - a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose? - a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Knapp, David K Raynor, Jonathan Silcock, Brian Parkinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 8%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Other 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 36%
Psychology 8 10%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,309,485
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,131
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,425
of 121,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.