↓ Skip to main content

Modeling biomedical experimental processes with OBI

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Semantics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling biomedical experimental processes with OBI
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan R Brinkman, Mélanie Courtot, Dirk Derom, Jennifer M Fostel, Yongqun He, Phillip Lord, James Malone, Helen Parkinson, Bjoern Peters, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Alan Ruttenberg, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Larisa N Soldatova, Christian J Stoeckert, Jessica A Turner, Jie Zheng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 8%
Germany 5 3%
United Kingdom 5 3%
Spain 4 3%
Brazil 4 3%
Sweden 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 111 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 10%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 11 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 35%
Computer Science 43 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Engineering 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 12 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,979,413
of 21,427,634 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#118
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,030
of 328,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,427,634 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them