You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The nuclear OXPHOS genes in insecta: a common evolutionary origin, a common cis-regulatory motif, a common destiny for gene duplicates
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-7-215 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Damiano Porcelli, Paolo Barsanti, Graziano Pesole, Corrado Caggese |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 6% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 26% |
Researcher | 9 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 5 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 54% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 24% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2007.
All research outputs
#5,422,967
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,311
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,552
of 90,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.