↓ Skip to main content

High prevalence of potential biases threatens the interpretation of trials in patients with chronic disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High prevalence of potential biases threatens the interpretation of trials in patients with chronic disease
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Vollenweider, Cynthia M Boyd, Milo A Puhan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 48%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2011.
All research outputs
#18,796,327
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,265
of 3,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,359
of 114,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#39
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.