↓ Skip to main content

Is the PANSS used correctly? a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the PANSS used correctly? a systematic review
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-11-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Obermeier, Rebecca Schennach-Wolff, Sebastian Meyer, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Michael Riedel, Daniela Krause, Florian Seemüller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Other 13 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 32%
Psychology 20 18%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2011.
All research outputs
#13,502,020
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,842
of 4,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,500
of 120,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.