↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog


88 Dimensions

Readers on

33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Published in
Retrovirology, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-1-27
Pubmed ID

Sandra Kao, Eri Miyagi, Mohammad A Khan, Hiroaki Takeuchi, Sandrine Opi, Ritu Goila-Gaur, Klaus Strebel

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2008.
All research outputs
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 188,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them