You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-1-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Glenis Scadding, Peter Hellings, Isam Alobid, Claus Bachert, Wytske Fokkens, Roy Gerth van Wijk, Philippe Gevaert, Josep Guilemany, Livije Kalogjera, Valerie Lund, Joaquim Mullol, Giovanni Passalacqua, Elina Toskala, Cornelius van Drunen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 50 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,924,455
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#81
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,390
of 129,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.