↓ Skip to main content

Balancing selection is common in the extended MHC region but most alleles with opposite risk profile for autoimmune diseases are neutrally evolving

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Balancing selection is common in the extended MHC region but most alleles with opposite risk profile for autoimmune diseases are neutrally evolving
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachele Cagliani, Stefania Riva, Uberto Pozzoli, Matteo Fumagalli, Giacomo P Comi, Nereo Bresolin, Mario Clerici, Manuela Sironi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Brazil 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 55 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Professor 8 13%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2011.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,267
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,691
of 125,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#55
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.