↓ Skip to main content

Indoor solid fuel use and tuberculosis in China: a matched case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indoor solid fuel use and tuberculosis in China: a matched case-control study
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaohong Kan, Chen-Yuan Chiang, Donald A Enarson, Wenhua Chen, Jianan Yang, Genwang Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 90 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 37%
Environmental Science 11 12%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2011.
All research outputs
#13,740,846
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,763
of 15,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,562
of 116,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#143
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.