You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulation methods to estimate design power: an overview for applied research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-94 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin F Arnold, Daniel R Hogan, John M Colford, Alan E Hubbard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 76 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 11% |
| Psychology | 31 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 28% |
| Unknown | 60 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,034,137
of 24,836,260 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,188
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,530
of 119,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,836,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.