You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Expression of c-myc is not critical for cell proliferation in established human leukemia lines
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, November 2001
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2199-2-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David M Tidd, Richard V Giles, Caroline M Broughton, Richard E Clark |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 2 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2001.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#778
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,032
of 48,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.