↓ Skip to main content

Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01630-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Avery Aunger, Ross Millar, Joanne Greenhalgh, Russell Mannion, Anne-Marie Rafferty, Hugh McLeod

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Master 14 9%
Lecturer 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 66 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 9%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 72 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,742,288
of 23,934,148 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#488
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,285
of 430,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#20
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,934,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.