You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interrupted time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models: a guide for evaluating large-scale health interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01235-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea L. Schaffer, Timothy A. Dobbins, Sallie-Anne Pearson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 26% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 424 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 13% |
| Researcher | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 14% |
| Unknown | 178 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 109 | 26% |
| Unknown | 205 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,152,525
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#118
of 2,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,060
of 452,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.