You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-2-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Holman, Cees AW Glas, Robert Lindeboom, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Rob J de Haan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Macao | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,279
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,449
of 50,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.