↓ Skip to main content

Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rudolf W Poolman, Peter AA Struijs, Rover Krips, Inger N Sierevelt, Kristina H Lutz, Mohit Bhandari

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2006.
All research outputs
#5,861,505
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#831
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,481
of 68,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.