You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular approaches to identify and differentiate Bacillus anthracis from phenotypically similar Bacillus species isolates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-6-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chung K Marston, Jay E Gee, Tanja Popovic, Alex R Hoffmaster |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2008.
All research outputs
#3,364,889
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#315
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,547
of 71,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.