↓ Skip to main content

A case of SFTS coinfected with E. coli bacteremia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case of SFTS coinfected with E. coli bacteremia
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-05705-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyungdon Lee, Woo Young Choi, Choon Mee Kim, Na-Ra Yun, Dong-Min Kim, Sang-Hyun Pyun, Byung Jun Yu, You Mi Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 9 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,797,301
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,706
of 7,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,184
of 503,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#117
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.