You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical review: Influenza pandemic – physicians and their obligations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc6918 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Devanand Anantham, Wendy McHugh, Stephen O'Neill, Lachlan Forrow |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 31% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 53% |
Psychology | 7 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2008.
All research outputs
#5,422,967
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,496
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,671
of 96,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.