↓ Skip to main content

Mindful "Vitality in Practice": an intervention to improve the work engagement and energy balance among workers; the development and design of the randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mindful "Vitality in Practice": an intervention to improve the work engagement and energy balance among workers; the development and design of the randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jantien van Berkel, Karin I Proper, Cécile RL Boot, Paulien M Bongers, Allard J van der Beek

Abstract

Modern working life has become more mental and less physical in nature, contributing to impaired mental health and a disturbed energy balance. This may result in mental health problems and overweight. Both are significant threats to the health of workers and thus also a financial burden for society, including employers. Targeting work engagement and energy balance could prevent impaired mental health and overweight, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 269 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 16%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 45 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Social Sciences 26 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 7%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 56 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,255,201
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,259
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,423
of 131,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#163
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.