You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining and searching for structural motifs using DeepView/Swiss-PdbViewer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-13-173 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria U Johansson, Vincent Zoete, Olivier Michielin, Nicolas Guex |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 68 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,515,553
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,143
of 7,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,939
of 181,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#11
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.