You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00598-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Tosoni, Indu Voruganti, Katherine Lajkosz, Flavio Habal, Patricia Murphy, Rebecca K. S. Wong, Donald Willison, Carl Virtanen, Ann Heesters, Fei-Fei Liu |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 43% |
| Canada | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,785,903
of 24,447,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#584
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,282
of 430,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,447,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.