↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of seven in silico tools for evaluating of daphnia and fish acute toxicity: case study on Chinese Priority Controlled Chemicals and new chemicals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of seven in silico tools for evaluating of daphnia and fish acute toxicity: case study on Chinese Priority Controlled Chemicals and new chemicals
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12859-020-03903-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linjun Zhou, Deling Fan, Wei Yin, Wen Gu, Zhen Wang, Jining Liu, Yanhua Xu, Lili Shi, Mingqing Liu, Guixiang Ji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 22 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 14%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 24 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,546,491
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,817
of 7,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,839
of 429,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#134
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.