↓ Skip to main content

Distinct groups of repetitive families preserved in mammals correspond to different periods of regulatory innovations in vertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct groups of repetitive families preserved in mammals correspond to different periods of regulatory innovations in vertebrates
Published in
Biology Direct, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-7-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerzy Jurka, Weidong Bao, Kenji K Kojima, Oleksiy Kohany, Matthew G Yurka

Abstract

Mammalian genomes are repositories of repetitive DNA sequences derived from transposable elements (TEs). Typically, TEs generate multiple, mostly inactive copies of themselves, commonly known as repetitive families or families of repeats. Recently, we proposed that families of TEs originate in small populations by genetic drift and that the origin of small subpopulations from larger populations can be fueled by biological innovations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 9%
Canada 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 29 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#446
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,342
of 202,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.