↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of nebivolol in Korean patients with hypertension by age and sex: a subanalysis from the BENEFIT-KOREA study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Hypertension, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of nebivolol in Korean patients with hypertension by age and sex: a subanalysis from the BENEFIT-KOREA study
Published in
Clinical Hypertension, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40885-021-00165-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyoung Im Cho, Dong Woon Jeon, Hyo Seung Ahn, Dong Kyu Jin, Hyun Sang Lee, Jong-Young Lee, Hong-Seok Lim, Athanasios J. Manolis, Seung-Woon Rha, Sang Won Park

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,152,540
of 18,925,022 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Hypertension
#63
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,363
of 322,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Hypertension
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,925,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them