You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do universal codon-usage patterns minimize the effects of mutation and translation error?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2005
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2005-6-11-r91 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roberto Marquez, Sandra Smit, Rob Knight |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Croatia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 181 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
Professor | 6 | 3% |
Student > Master | 3 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 139 | 72% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 142 | 74% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2010.
All research outputs
#6,596,537
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,144
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,389
of 70,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.