You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spontaneous esophageal rupture following perforated peptic ulcer: a report of two cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13019-021-01431-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chieh-Wei Chang, Yu-Ju Hung, Chien-Pin Chan, Chang-Lun Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,801,532
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#657
of 1,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,154
of 429,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#26
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.