↓ Skip to main content

ORCHIDS: an Observational Randomized Controlled Trial on Childhood Differential Susceptibility

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ORCHIDS: an Observational Randomized Controlled Trial on Childhood Differential Susceptibility
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-917
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rabia R Chhangur, Joyce Weeland, Geertjan Overbeek, WalterCHJ Matthys, Bram Orobio de Castro

Abstract

A central tenet in developmental psychopathology is that childhood rearing experiences have a major impact on children's development. Recently, candidate genes have been identified that may cause children to be differentially susceptible to these experiences (i.e., susceptibility genes). However, our understanding of the differential impact of parenting is limited at best. Specifically, more experimental research is needed. The ORCHIDS study will investigate gene-(gene-)environment interactions to obtain more insight into a) moderating effects of polymorphisms on the link between parenting and child behavior, and b) behavioral mechanisms that underlie these gene-(gene-)environment interactions in an experimental design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 26%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 45%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,154,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,263
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,460
of 183,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#179
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.