You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive identification of somatic nucleotide variants in human brain tissue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-021-02285-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yifan Wang, Taejeong Bae, Jeremy Thorpe, Maxwell A. Sherman, Attila G. Jones, Sean Cho, Kenneth Daily, Yanmei Dou, Javier Ganz, Alon Galor, Irene Lobon, Reenal Pattni, Chaggai Rosenbluh, Simone Tomasi, Livia Tomasini, Xiaoxu Yang, Bo Zhou, Schahram Akbarian, Laurel L. Ball, Sara Bizzotto, Sarah B. Emery, Ryan Doan, Liana Fasching, Yeongjun Jang, David Juan, Esther Lizano, Lovelace J. Luquette, John B. Moldovan, Rujuta Narurkar, Matthew T. Oetjens, Rachel E. Rodin, Shobana Sekar, Joo Heon Shin, Eduardo Soriano, Richard E. Straub, Weichen Zhou, Andrew Chess, Joseph G. Gleeson, Tomas Marquès-Bonet, Peter J. Park, Mette A. Peters, Jonathan Pevsner, Christopher A. Walsh, Daniel R. Weinberger, Flora M. Vaccarino, John V. Moran, Alexander E. Urban, Jeffrey M. Kidd, Ryan E. Mills, Alexej Abyzov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,568,528
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,274
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,584
of 453,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#45
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.