↓ Skip to main content

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 2,236)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
83 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4483 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Published in
Systematic Reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W. Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 347 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 326 10%
Student > Bachelor 255 8%
Researcher 213 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 145 5%
Other 433 14%
Unknown 1458 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 328 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 202 6%
Social Sciences 139 4%
Psychology 125 4%
Engineering 121 4%
Other 696 22%
Unknown 1566 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#415,794
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#45
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,407
of 454,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.