You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motion compensated whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using focused navigation (fNAV)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00717-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher W. Roy, John Heerfordt, Davide Piccini, Giulia Rossi, Anna Giulia Pavon, Juerg Schwitter, Matthias Stuber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 29% |
| Researcher | 8 | 26% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,200,399
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#539
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,823
of 454,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.