↓ Skip to main content

Stearns SC, Koella JC: Evolution in Health and Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stearns SC, Koella JC: Evolution in Health and Disease
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-2-4
Authors

Jerzy M Behnke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,112
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,674
of 183,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.