↓ Skip to main content

Biochar’s effect on the ecosystem services provided by sandy-textured and contaminated sandy soils: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biochar’s effect on the ecosystem services provided by sandy-textured and contaminated sandy soils: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13750-021-00223-1
Authors

Madina Bekchanova, Luca Campion, Stephan Bruns, Tom Kuppens, Marijke Jozefczak, Ann Cuypers, Robert Malina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 21 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,942,738
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#290
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,622
of 429,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.