↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of personal letters to healthcare professionals in changing professional behaviours: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of personal letters to healthcare professionals in changing professional behaviours: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01650-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aikaterini Grimani, Louis Goffe, Mei Yee Tang, Fiona Beyer, Falko F. Sniehotta, Ivo Vlaev

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Librarian 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,088,918
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#354
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,379
of 431,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#17
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.