You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Formulation of novel lipid-coated magnetic nanoparticles as the probe for in vivo imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1423-0127-16-86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huey-Chung Huang, Po-Yuan Chang, Karen Chang, Chao-Yu Chen, Chung-Wu Lin, Jyh-Horng Chen, Chung-Yuan Mou, Zee-Fen Chang, Fu-Hsiung Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 28% |
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 18 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,357,897
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#304
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,805
of 106,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.