↓ Skip to main content

Social support and age influence distress outcomes differentially across urban, regional and remote Australia: an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social support and age influence distress outcomes differentially across urban, regional and remote Australia: an exploratory study
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Allen, Kerry J Inder, Terry J Lewin, John Attia, Brian J Kelly

Abstract

The variation of determinants of mental health with remoteness has rarely been directly examined. The current research aims to examine whether the association of psychosocial factors with psychological distress outcomes varies with increasing remoteness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 16%
Psychology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,154,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,263
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,431
of 183,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#176
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.