You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The dysbiosis signature of Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer-cause or consequences? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Cell International, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12935-021-01886-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maryam Ranjbar, Rasoul Salehi, Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard, Laleh Rafiee, Habibollah Faraji, Sima jafarpor, Gordon A. Ferns, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan, Mostafa Manian, Reza Nedaeinia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 27 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 33 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,380,978
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#743
of 1,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,226
of 434,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#19
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.