You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying biological landmarks using a novel cell measuring image analysis tool: Cell-o-Tape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-8-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew P French, Michael H Wilson, Kim Kenobi, Daniela Dietrich, Ute Voß, Susana Ubeda-Tomás, Tony P Pridmore, Darren M Wells |
| Abstract |
The ability to quantify the geometry of plant organs at the cellular scale can provide novel insights into their structural organization. Hitherto manual methods of measurement provide only very low throughput and subjective solutions, and often quantitative measurements are neglected in favour of a simple cell count. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 28% |
| Researcher | 26 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#823
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,924
of 168,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.