You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-7-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth D Mandl, William W Simons, William CR Crawford, Jonathan M Abbett |
| Abstract |
Personally controlled health records (PCHRs), a subset of personal health records (PHRs), enable a patient to assemble, maintain and manage a secure copy of his or her medical data. Indivo (formerly PING) is an open source, open standards PCHR with an open application programming interface (API). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 135 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 25% |
| Unknown | 14 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 57 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,667,122
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#777
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,330
of 71,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.