↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory, scientific, and ethical issues arising from institutional activity in one of the 90 Italian Research Ethics Committees

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulatory, scientific, and ethical issues arising from institutional activity in one of the 90 Italian Research Ethics Committees
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12910-021-00605-7
Authors

G. Benfatto, Laura Longo, Silvana Mansueto, Lucia Gozzo, Daniela C. Vitale, Salvatore Amato, Francesco Basile, Adele Blanco, Vito Borzì, Patrizia Cavallaro, Sonia Cilia, Mario Conti, Concetto Cristaudo, Letterio D. Daidone, Salvatore Di Fazzio, Maurizio Di Mauro, Rosaria Garozzo, Gaetano Giardina, Antonio Gulino, Liliana Iachelli, Maria L. La Bella, Agata La Rosa, Antonio Lazzara, Francesco Leonardi, Francesca Lo Monaco, Lorenzo Malatino, Teresa Mattina, Matteo Negro, Filippo Palermo, Stefano Puleo, Rosa Raciti, Martino Ruggieri, Antonio Sapuppo, Renato Scillieri, Sebastiano Squatrito, Francesco Tanasi, F. Drago

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#11,586,896
of 19,026,578 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#654
of 850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,756
of 325,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,026,578 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them