↓ Skip to main content

Facilitators and barriers to screening for child abuse in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facilitators and barriers to screening for child abuse in the emergency department
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eveline CFM Louwers, Ida J Korfage, Marjo J Affourtit, Harry J De Koning, Henriëtte A Moll

Abstract

To identify facilitators of, and barriers to, screening for child abuse in emergency departments (ED) through interviews with ED staff, members of the hospital Board, and related experts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 17%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Psychology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#4,026,714
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#712
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,528
of 183,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.