↓ Skip to main content

Routine use of weaning predictors: not so fast

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine use of weaning predictors: not so fast
Published in
Critical Care, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc8121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott K Epstein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,396
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,160
of 107,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.