↓ Skip to main content

NHS health checks through general practice: randomised trial of population cardiovascular risk reduction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NHS health checks through general practice: randomised trial of population cardiovascular risk reduction
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-944
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Cochrane, Rachel Davey, Zafar Iqbal, Christopher Gidlow, Jagdish Kumar, Ruth Chambers, Yvonne Mawby

Abstract

The global burden of the major vascular diseases is projected to rise and to remain the dominant non-communicable disease cluster well into the twenty first century. The Department of Health in England has developed the NHS Health Check service as a policy initiative to reduce population vascular disease risk. The aims of this study were to monitor population changes in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors over the first year of the new service and to assess the value of tailored lifestyle support, including motivational interview with ongoing support and referral to other services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 200 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Researcher 20 10%
Other 14 7%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 19%
Psychology 16 8%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 45 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,678,916
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,074
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,812
of 184,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#44
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.