↓ Skip to main content

The patient enablement instrument for back pain: reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 2,210)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The patient enablement instrument for back pain: reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12955-021-01758-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Molgaard Nielsen, J. Hartvigsen, A. Kongsted, B. Öberg, P. Enthoven, A. Abbott, H. H. Lauridsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 25 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,105,234
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#48
of 2,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,091
of 435,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.