↓ Skip to main content

How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Wilson, Robert Rush, Susan Hussey, Christine Puckering, Fiona Sim, Clare S Allely, Paul Doku, Alex McConnachie, Christopher Gillberg

Abstract

Interventions to promote positive parenting are often reported to offer good outcomes for children but they can consume substantial resources and they require rigorous appraisal.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 224 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 21%
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 36%
Social Sciences 49 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 43 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#314,211
of 19,910,352 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#252
of 2,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,843
of 173,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#14
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,910,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.