You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prospective evaluation of direct approach with a tablet device as a strategy to enhance survey study participant response rate
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-605 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa J Parker, Asmaa Manan, Sara Urbanski |
Abstract |
Investigators conduct survey studies for a variety of reasons. Poor participant response rates are common, however, and may limit the generalizability and utility of results. The objective of this study was to determine whether direct approach with a tablet device enhances survey study participant response rate and to assess participants' experiences with this mode of survey administration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 33% |
Psychology | 4 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2012.
All research outputs
#13,674,168
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,783
of 4,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,122
of 184,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#41
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.