You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Dehydrodiisoeugenol inhibits colorectal cancer growth by endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced autophagic pathways
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, April 2021
Changhong Li, Kui Zhang, Guangzhao Pan, Haoyan Ji, Chongyang Li, Xiaowen Wang, Xin Hu, Ruochen Liu, Longfei Deng, Yi Wang, Liqun Yang, Hongjuan Cui
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||5||24%|
|Student > Master||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||24%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||10%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||5%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
of 2,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 434,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.