↓ Skip to main content

Comparative regulomics supports pervasive selection on gene dosage following whole genome duplication

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative regulomics supports pervasive selection on gene dosage following whole genome duplication
Published in
Genome Biology, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13059-021-02323-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gareth B. Gillard, Lars Grønvold, Line L. Røsæg, Matilde Mengkrog Holen, Øystein Monsen, Ben F. Koop, Eric B. Rondeau, Manu Kumar Gundappa, John Mendoza, Daniel J. Macqueen, Rori V. Rohlfs, Simen R. Sandve, Torgeir R. Hvidsten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#991,403
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#700
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,702
of 455,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#17
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.