↓ Skip to main content

Experimental comparison of two methods to study barley responses to partial submergence

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental comparison of two methods to study barley responses to partial submergence
Published in
Plant Methods, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13007-021-00742-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Miricescu, Tomás Byrne, Catherine M. Doorly, Carl K. Y. Ng, Susanne Barth, Emmanuelle Graciet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,209,706
of 24,022,746 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#448
of 1,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,979
of 430,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,022,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.