You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-021-00711-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Wilson, Jenny Billings, Julie MacInnes, Rasa Mikelyte, Elizabeth Welch, Kath Checkland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 42% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Andorra | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,695,281
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#191
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,249
of 433,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.